Thursday 31 May 2018

JUNE IS BLACK MUSIC MONTH








 
JUNE IS BLACK MUSIC MONTH 


Murphy Browne © Wednesday May 28 2014

 

 

“A lot of people don’t realize that just about all Negro spirituals are written on the Black notes of the piano. Probably the most famous on this slave scale was written by John Newton, who used to be the captain of a slave ship, and many believe he heard this melody that sounds very much like a West African sorrow chant. And it has a haunting, haunting plaintive quality to it that reaches past your arrogance, past your pride, and it speaks to that part of you that’s in bondage. And we feel it. We feel it. It’s just one of the most amazing melodies in all of human history.”

 

 

Quote from gospel singer, Wintley Phipps, during his performance at Carnegie Hall in 2002.

 

 

 

Wintley Augustus Phipps is an African-American gospel singer who was born in Trinidad & Tobago on January 7, 1955 and grew up in Montreal, Quebec where his family moved when he was about five-years-old.

 

 

Phipps is one in a long line of talented, inspirational African-American gospel singers and has performed for several U.S. Presidents, including Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama at National Prayer Breakfast events and other celebrations.

 

 

He also performed at the 1984 and 1988 National Democratic Conventions, Rosa Parks’ 77th birthday gala at the Kennedy Center and for the late South African President, Nelson Mandela.

 

 

 

Phipps’ quote in 2002 during his performance of “Amazing Grace” at Carnegie Hall not surprisingly has garnered both praise and condemnation.

 

 

Comments from some White people included that he was racist because he expressed too much pride in his Africanness. Phipps’ comment was pertinent because many people do not know the history of African contributions to popular contemporary music. That is why it is so important that we continue to celebrate/observe Black Music Month. June has been recognized as Black Music Month since 1979.

 

 

In June 1979, then U.S. President Jimmy Carter designated June as “Black Music Month”. Carter made that declaration at the urging of songwriter and producer, Kenneth Gamble of Gamble and Huff and broadcasters, Ed Wright and Dyana Williams, who lobbied for the official recognition of a Black Music Month. Huff, Wright and Williams were members of the “Black Music Association”.

 

 

In an interview with Hillary Crosley of The Griot published on May 30, 2013 entitled “The Economic Origins of Black Music Month”, Gamble explained the need for the recognition of Black Music Month: “The Black Music Association was a trade association at the time, and it was an educational forum for young producers and writers – African-Americans in particular – where they could discuss the benefits of the music industry. History says that most African-Americans in the industry were robbed of their songs and their property.

 

“The Black Music Association spoke to the marketing of Black music. The whole theme was ‘Black Music Is Green’ and it dealt with the economics of African-American music. It was very helpful not only to us but also the industry at large. Then the Black Music Association created Black Music Month, which was another original, because October was Country Music Month. What happens when you have a music month? You get additional marketing dollars, and it helps to market and promote the artists. It’s still working, because right now we’re talking about something that started 34 years ago.”

 

 

In an interview published in the July 2013 edition of Ebony Magazine under the title “Dyana Williams: Godmother of Black Music Month,” the woman who many consider the “Mother of Black Music Month” is quoted: “While it was declared by President Carter in 1979, as far as the U.S. government was concerned, it didn’t become official until 2000. People refer to me as the ‘Mother of Black Music Month’ because of my work in getting Black Music Month legislatively recognized by Congress. I also established an organization called the International Association of African American Music Foundation (IAAAMF). Through this foundation, we enacted this legislation. It was a very proud moment when they called me and said the bill was going up for a vote. Congressman Chaka Fattah from Philadelphia was the individual I worked with to get the legislation passed. He was the one who introduced it on the floor of the House of Representatives.”

 

 

 

In that interview Williams was asked about the relevance of celebrating/observing Black Music Month today and her reply was: “It is important to celebrate Black Music Month because it’s a recognition and ownership of our culture. It’s something that we need to be proud of. If you ask artists from different cultures, they’ll tell you how influential Black music has been to them. Ask Mick Jagger. Ask Paul McCartney. Ask Eric Clapton. Ask Kid Rock. Ask them how much Black music influenced their careers. The Rolling Stones got their group name from an old Muddy Waters record.

 

 

 

“In some cases, most White artists know our music better than we do. It’s important to know because it’s a source of inspiration and a motivating factor. It enhances our overall life experience and that’s why I’m so passionate about this music. It serves as a source of pride and a source of great history as well. How can you not be proud when you look at the timeline of our musical history? We’ve struggled and our music has paralleled those struggles in America. It tells our stories of enslavement, our desire for freedom, and our victories and defeats. It’s the soundtrack to our experience in this country.”

 

 

 

Making music was one of the few pleasures that enslaved Africans enjoyed, that helped them to retain some of the culture that was brutally torn from them by the White slave holders in their attempt to dehumanize the Africans. The spirituals that were used as a coded language by many enslaved Africans when planning their escape is a testament to the power of our music.

 

 

 

Music has sustained Africans dealing with myriad oppressions as expressed by the African-American poet Paul Laurence Dunbar (1872-1906) in his poem Sympathy (published 1899):

“I know why the caged bird sings, ah me,

When his wing is bruised and his bosom sore, –

When he beats his bars and he would be free;

It is not a carol of joy or glee,

But a prayer that he sends from his heart’s deep core,

But a plea, that upward to Heaven he flings –

I know why the caged bird sings!”

 

 

At his soul-stirring rendition of “Amazing Grace”, which he delivered at Carnegie Hall in 2002 Wintley Phipps explained some of the history: “Just about all Negro Spirituals are written on Black notes of the piano. This is absolutely true, you can go home tonight and play almost any Negro Spiritual, just play the Black notes on the piano. There are five Black notes on the piano, and those same Black notes just keep occurring. And you can go home tonight and play almost any Negro Spiritual, just play the Black notes. That’s because the slaves didn’t come to America with: ‘Do Re Mi Fa So La Ti Do’. That’s somebody else’s scale. All they had in their musical scale were the five Black notes we know as the Pentatonic scale and they built the power and the pathos of the Negro spiritual on five notes. When you study music you also come across what are known as ‘White spirituals’. Did you know that? And there are White composers who work with that scale, in early America they used to call it ‘The Slave Scale’. And I’m gonna play for you what some musicologists think is the most famous White spiritual built on the slave scale with just the Black notes.”

 

 

 

“Amazing Grace” was published in 1779 with John Newton credited as the author but the melody is documented as composed by “Unknown”. There is no official recognition that the melody is a West African mourning chant. However we know that over the centuries the music of Africans has been appropriated by White people who made a fortune from that music and refused to acknowledge the source or compensate the composers/originators.

 

 

 

Newton reportedly had his spiritual conversion in 1748 when a violent storm battered his ship so severely that he called out to God for mercy and his ship and life were spared. However he continued his slave-trading even after this “Road to Damascus” epiphany.

 

 

 

In the introduction to the 1962 book “The Journal of a Slave Trader (John Newton), 1750-1754, With Newton’s Thoughts upon the African Slave Trade,” authors Bernard Davis Martin and Mark Spurrell wrote: “When Newton began his journal in 1750, not only was slave trading seen as a respectable profession by the majority of Britons, its necessity to the overall prosperity of the kingdom was communally understood and approved.”

 

 

 

Today the descendants of enslaved Africans are demanding reparations for the unpaid labour of their ancestors that enriched White people for generations. During Black Music Month we can begin to consider who is reaping riches from the talents of African musicians and demand reparations there also!

 

 

Murphy Browne © Wednesday May 28 2014

Friday 18 May 2018

EL HAJJ MALIK EL SHABAZZ MAY 19-1925








EL HAJJ MALIK EL SHABAZZ MAY 19-1925


On Saturday May 19-2018 El Hajj Malik El Shabazz would have been 93 years old. On February 21-1965 he was assassinated at the Audubon Ballroom in Harlem as he was about to address the Organization of Afro-American Unity an organization he had founded on June 24, 1964 in Harlem, New York. His widow Dr. Betty Shabazz was pregnant with twins Malikah and Malaak who never saw their father. On Sunday February 21-1965 El Hajj Malik El Shabazz transitioned to the ancestral realm and African Americans lost their "Black Shining Prince." http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/ecourse/0402/web/readings/P2S1.html


Eulogized by African American actor and activist Ossie Davis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_TXg15sq1s




Murphy Browne © Wednesday May 16 2012

EL HAJJ MALIK EL SHABAZZ MAY 19-1925



El Hajj Malik El Shabazz was born Malcolm Little on May 19, 1925 in Omaha, Nebraska. He is seriously underrated as an influential figure in African-American history. Shabazz worked tirelessly and was uncompromisingly committed to the liberation of Africans. He was a Pan-Africanist whose philosophy was based on that of the Honourable Marcus Mosiah Garvey.

Garvey’s influence on Shabazz is not surprising because his parents were members of Garvey’s United Negro Improvement Association (UNIA), an organization whose founder/leader openly declared war against imperialism, colonialism and White supremacy.

Shabazz’s parents, Earl and Louise Langdon Little, met at a UNIA Convention in Montreal, Canada and were married on May 10, 1919.

Like Garvey, Shabazz was an icon of the African Diaspora and oppressed people worldwide. As well as being a Pan-Africanist, Shabazz was a dedicated Muslim and human rights activist and advocate. He chastised any individual, institution, organization or government body that worked against the interest of the suffering African-Americans. He fearlessly went right to the heart of the matter and made no apologies while doing so.

This quote from the Autobiography of Malcolm X is a case in point: “I can\’t turn around without hearing about some \’civil rights advance\’! White people seem to think the Black man ought to be shouting \’hallelujah\’! Four hundred years the White man has had his foot-long knife in the Black man\’s back – and now the White man starts to wiggle the knife out, maybe six inches! The Black man\’s supposed to be grateful? Why, if the White man jerked the knife out, it\’s still going to leave a scar!\”

Again with his “take no prisoners” style, Shabazz addressed the White supremacy practiced in Christian churches during his famous “Ballot or the Bullet” speech: “Don\’t join a church where White Nationalism is preached. Now you can go to a Negro church and be exposed to White Nationalism, \’cause you are – when you walk in a Negro church and a White Mary and some White angels – that Negro church is preaching White Nationalism. But when you go to a church and you see the pastor of that church with a philosophy and a program that\’s designed to bring Black people together and elevate Black people – join that church. Join that church. If you see where the NAACP is preaching and practicing that which is designed to make Black Nationalism materialize – join the NAACP. Join any kind of organization – civic, religious, fraternal, political, or otherwise – that\’s based on lifting the Black man up and making him master of his own community.”

Shabazz also spoke about the importance of names. In an interview he addressed the issue of Africans in the Diaspora, the descendants of enslaved Africans, being stripped of their African names and saddled with the names of the White people who enslaved their ancestors.

In this quote he addressed the reaction of White people to Africans from the continent who were not stripped of their names: “When I\’m traveling around the country, I use my real Muslim name, Malik Shabazz. I make my hotel reservations under that name, and I always see the same thing I\’ve just been telling you. I come to the desk and always see that \’here-comes-a-Negro\’ look. It\’s kind of a reserved, coldly tolerant cordiality. But when I say \’Malik Shabazz\’, their whole attitude changes: they snap to respect. They think I\’m an African. People say what\’s in a name? There\’s a whole lot in a name. The American Black man is seeing the African respected as a human being. The African gets respect because he has an identity and cultural roots. But most of all because the African owns some land. For these reasons he has his human rights recognized, and that makes his civil rights automatic.\”

Shabazz was a man before his time because, while the majority of African-American political figures of his era sought freedom and liberation through social inclusion within the United States, he sought human rights on an international level. On July 17, 1963, he addressed the members of the “African Summit”, the second meeting of the Organization of African Unity (OAU), which had been founded in 1963 to bring about joint action by the independent African governments. The OAU conference was held in Cairo (Egypt’s capital) from July 17 to 21, and was attended by nearly all the heads of the 34 member states.

During his presentation he appealed to the African leaders to support their brethren suffering in America: “We beseech the independent African states to help us bring our problem before the United Nations, on the grounds that the United States government is morally incapable of protecting the lives and the property of 22 million African-Americans. And on the grounds that our deteriorating plight is definitely becoming a threat to world peace.

“Out of frustration and hopelessness our young people have reached the point of no return. We no longer endorse patience and turning-the-other-cheek. We assert the right of self-defence by whatever means necessary, and reserve the right of maximum retaliation against our racist oppressors, no matter what the odds against us are.

“From here on in, if we must die anyway, we will die fighting back and we will not die alone. We intend to see that our racist oppressors also get a taste of death. We are well aware that our future efforts to defend ourselves by retaliating – by meeting violence with violence, eye for eye and tooth for tooth – could create the type of racial conflict in America that could easily escalate into a violent, world-wide, bloody race war. In the interests of world peace and security, we beseech the heads of the independent African states to recommend an immediate investigation into our problem by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzjn11OGBK8

On a recent visit to New York City, I was saddened and shocked when at the Countee Cullen Library there was no evidence, on the eve of this great man’s birthday, of recognition of his contributions to the advancement of human rights for racialized people, Africans and specifically African-Americans. The library is located in Harlem where Shabazz did most of his advocacy and, even more ironic, it is at the corner of Malcolm X Boulevard and West 135th Street.

Surrounded by streets with names such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Frederick Douglass Boulevard and Adam Clayton Powell Jr. Boulevard, it is indeed a great shame that the powers that be at this branch could not find the time to at least mount a display to honour this African-American revolutionary and human rights activist.

Speaking with staff members at the library, I was directed to various shelves containing a total of two titles about the life and work of Shabazz. I needed help to find them. After unsuccessfully searching the shelves to which I was directed, a staff member eventually located a single copy of Malcolm X for Beginners by Bernard Aquina Doctor, published in 1992, and on the third floor there were five copies of The Autobiography of Malcolm X by Alex Haley, also published in 1992.

Although I was bitterly disappointed at the lack of information and lack of enthusiasm at that library, I live in hope that my enquiries about books on the life of this great man will have moved the staff to at least mount a display of books that they may have to borrow from other branches of the New York Public Library system.

The man loved books; he was extremely well read and by viewing some of the interviews he did where he confounded White journalists, it is so evident. This from one of his reportedly famous quotes: “My alma mater was books, a good library… I could spend the rest of my life reading, just satisfying my curiosity.\”

The life work of Shabazz (short as it was, he was 39 when he was assassinated) has had a profound impact on the lives of millions even though much of what he did is still misunderstood. While he was alive, the impact was not recognized as he was vilified by White media and even some of his own people but much has changed for the betterment of racialized people because of Shabazz’s life work which has benefited more than African-Americans.

Maybe 50 years from now, when many of us have transitioned and are not here to read it, someone will write: “Can you imagine how differently everything would have turned out with the Trayvon Martin case, the laws that would have remained unchanged, if Reverend Al Sharpton and Reverend Jessie Jackson had not become involved?”




Murphy Browne © Wednesday May 16 2012









Thursday 17 May 2018

BROWN V BOARD OF EDUCATION DECISION 64 YEARS AGO MAY 17-1954







Murphy Browne © May 17-2018

BROWN V BOARD OF EDUCATION DECISION 64 YEARS AGO MAY 17-1954

Sixty four years ago on May 17, 1954 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case of Brown v. Board of Education that school segregation was against the law. It was one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court decisions. The events that led up to May 17, 1954 began in Topeka, Kansas in 1951 when an African American father, Oliver Brown challenged the Topeka, Kansas School Board in court on behalf of his 8 year old daughter Linda Brown. Oliver Brown’s 8 year old third-grader Linda had to walk one mile through a dangerous railroad switchyard to get to her segregated elementary school when a white elementary school was a few blocks away from her home. Brown, tried to enroll his daughter in the white elementary school, but the principal of the school refused to enroll the child. Oliver Brown, pastor of St. Mark’s A.M.E. Church appealed to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) for help and a class action lawsuit against the Topeka, Kansas Board of Education was launched when 13 other African American parents on behalf of their 20 children joined Brown and the NAACP requested an injunction to forbid the segregation of Topeka's public schools.


The case eventually made its way to the Supreme Court of the USA with 200 plaintiffs from five states; Delaware, Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia and Washington. Three years later the U.S. Supreme Court issued its historic Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, 347 U.S. 483, on May 17, 1954. The decision declared all laws establishing segregated schools to be unconstitutional and called for the desegregation of all schools throughout the nation. The Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision did not require desegregation of public schools by a specific time but after the decision the NAACP attempted to register African American students in previously all-white schools in cities throughout the South.


The Browns (Oliver and Leola) had two younger daughters Terry and Cheryl who were 4 years old and 5 months old at the time of trial. Linda Brown attended Monroe Elementary, a school located 21 blocks from their home on West First Street with all African American students. At the time only four of the city's 22 elementary schools were open to African American students. During the trial Oliver Brown testified that "many times [Linda] had to wait through cold, the rain, and the snow" for a bus to take her to Monroe, even though the family lived only seven blocks from an all-white elementary school. Oliver also testified that Linda's route to her bus stop took her over a "main thoroughfare...with a vast amount of traffic." Just six years after the decision when Oliver Brown was only 42 when he transitioned to the ancestral realm in 1961 due to a heart attack. His daughter Linda Brown (born February 20 1943) on whose behalf he engaged in the battle against the school board transitioned to the ancestral realm on March 25 2018 at 75 years old.


Murphy Browne © May 17-2018







Sunday 13 May 2018

ABOLITION OF SLAVERY IN BRAZIL MAY 13-1888









Murphy Browne @ May 10-2018

 ABOLITION OF SLAVERY IN BRAZIL MAY 13-1888


“Whoever would like to buy three native slave women from Angola, who have come recently f...rom that place, one who irons and does laundry, another a baker and laundress, and the third also a laundress, all with very good figures and the ability to do every kind of work in the house, should contact Manoel do Nascimento da Mata, Rua Direita No. 54, first floor.”


Advertisement from “Diario do Rio de Janeiro” December 17, 1821.

On May 13, 1888 Brazil became the last country in the Americas to abolish the enslavement of Africans. Two years before on October 7, 1886 slavery had been abolished in Cuba. The advertisement for the sale of enslaved African women in the December 17, 1821 publication was one of many such advertisements in “Diario do Rio de Janeiro.” It was the leading newspaper of Rio de Janeiro published from June 1, 1821 – October 30, 1878 and carried advertisements for the sale, purchase and rental of enslaved Africans in Brazil. There were also advertisements seeking help in capturing “runaways” and offering rewards for the recapture of those Africans who fled their enslavement. In the same “Diario do Rio de Janeiro” December 17, 1821 edition this advertisement was published: “On November 20 a Mozambique slave named Martinho fled from a ranch at the Engenho Novo. He is still unacquainted with the country, a boy with a beard, and he ran away with a chain attached to his leg. Anyone knowing anything about him should come to Rua do Sabao to the house of Major Manoel dos Santos Portugal, who is his master and will pay for the trouble involved.”
The advertisements contained detailed physical description, skills and even clothing of the Africans. The advertisements also reveal the callous and inhumane mindset of the Europeans who enslaved the Africans. The Africans were frequently “branded” as described in this advertisement: “On the 2lst of this month a new slave who recently came from Angola fled from Valongo warehouse No. 106. On his left breast he has a brand mark in the shape of an "S" set in the middle of a triangle. Anyone with news of him should go to the same warehouse, where he will find his master, who will give him a good reward.”




The Africans who fled their enslavement frequently headed for freedom in a quilombo. A quilombo is described as “a Brazilian hinterland settlement founded by people of African origin including the Quilombolas, or Maroons.” The most famous and successful quilombo was Palmares established in 1594 by Africans who fled enslavement and survived and thrived for 100 years until 1694. Palmares had a population of 30,000 by 1694 when Zumbi the last leader of Palmares was betrayed by one of his own people which led to the destruction of the community. Some of Zumbi’s followers who escaped the carnage of the Portuguese attack on Palmares, escaped to live in other quilombos. Enslaved Africans continued to flee until slavery was abolished in Brazil in 1888. Some of the quilombos were so well hidden that they were never discovered by the Portuguese and the inhabitants lived in freedom and seclusion. In one case the inhabitants of a quilombo (Remanso, Bahia) were unaware until they were discovered in the 1960s that slavery had been abolished for more than 70 years!




Enslaved Africans also attempted armed resistance in pursuit of freedom. One of the most well-known instance of armed resistance was the “Revolta dos Malês” of 1835 which was the uprising of a group of enslaved Muslim Africans in Bahia. The Portuguese referred to the African Muslims as “Malê.” Enslaved Africans in Bahia had made attempts at seizing their freedom in 1807, 1809, 1814, 1816, 1822, 1824, 1826, 1827, 1828, 1830, 1831 and then came the uprising of 1835. The Malê uprising also known as “The Great Revolt” was scheduled to begin on a Sunday in January 1835, in Bahia. The group included enslaved and free Africans. Most of them (Hausa and Yoruba) were taken from West Africa and were already Muslim converts before they were captured and enslaved by the Portuguese. The uprising was scheduled to take place on the feast day of Our Lady of Guidance, a celebration in Bonfim, a time when many of the Catholic Portuguese would leave Bahia to travel to Bonfim for the weekend to celebrate. The African freedom fighters were strategic in choosing the date because there would be fewer Portuguese civilians and military in Bahia. In his 1995 published book “Slave Rebellion in Brazil: The Muslim Uprising of 1835 in Bahia” Portuguese Brazilian historian João José Reis wrote: “The celebration would take many people, off to the distant locale of Bonfim. A good part of the police force would also head in that direction in order to keep the celebrators in line.”




While the uprising was scheduled to take place on Sunday, January 25, the freedom fighters were forced to start before the planned time. On Saturday January 24, several incidents of betrayal conspired to force the freedom fighters to move the action up to Saturday night. Almost like a grim “tragedy of errors” the Africans found themselves having to change plans unexpectedly with disastrous results. With the Portuguese authorities alerted and the Africans outnumbered and outgunned the result of the planned insurrection was inevitable.




Although the Africans in Bahia did not successfully end their enslavement in 1835, the Portuguese and other European slaveholders in Brazil were forced to reckon with the spectre of what could have been a repeat of Haiti 34 years earlier in 1801. The “Revolta dos Malês” of 1835 sounded the death knell for Brazilian slavery which ended 53 years later on May 13-1888. Continued African resistance ended slavery in Brazil as everywhere else where Africans were enslaved.

 Murphy Browne @ May 10-2018